A brief look at the 2009 NBA Draft

Let's take a look at one of the weakest drafts in recent years:

1. LA Clippers – Blake Griffin, 6'10”, PF, Oklahoma

No surprise here. He's the most established bona fide talent with good size. The Clips didn't screw up this pick, but it will be interesting to see how the Clippers play Zach Randolph, Chris Kaman, Marcus Camby and Griffin together. Hey, if Randolph loves to shoot the 3 that much, why don't they just start him at SG?

2. Memphis – Hasheem Thabeet, 7'3”, C, Uconn

As expected. Again, I'm not sold on Thabeet. I think his D is overrated. I think the Mutombo comparison is a joke. I don't think he will flourish in the league. He has a big chance to be a bust. But then, you can't really teach 7'3”. It would be interesting to see him play along with another 7-footer, Marc Gasol.

3. Oklahoma City – James Harden, 6'5”, SG, Arizona State

This is a safe bet. Apparently they are satisfied with Russell Westbrook at PG and therefore passed on Ricky Rubio. Harden fills their need at SG. Harden played badly in the Tourney and this probably is a sign of weakness. I don't think Harden will be great. Remember you read it here first.

4. Sacramento – Tyreke Evans, 6'5”, SG, Memphis

What the heck are the Kings thinking? They need a PG and they didn't pick Rubio? They've got Kevin Martin and Rashad McCants at SG already, why do they want another SG? Oh, they got Sergio Rodriguez from the Blazers via trade. But do they really think that Rodriguez is better than Rubio?

5. Minnesota (from Washington) – Ricky Rubio, 6'5”, PG, Spain

OK, the Wolves got 4 first round picks and here's the first one. They need a PG and they picked the best PG on board. They should thank the Kings for that. We have seen how good Rubio is in the Olympics. I especially like his game-making ability and his size.

6. Minnesota – Jonny Flynn, 6'1”, PG, Syracuse

The Wolves strangely picked 2 PGs in a row. While it's not announced yet, likely they will trade either one of them. Flynn is a flashy PG and people compare him with Telfair. Oops, that comparison doesn't look good to me.

7. Golden State – Stephen Curry, 6'3”, PG, Davidson

I like Stephen Curry since last year's NCAA Tourney. He's fearless and has superb leadership. Though Davidson did not make the Tourney this year, Curry has gradually developed playmaking skills and has silently transformed into a PG. The Knicks love him and he loves the Knicks, only that he is going to GSW. Too bad. He's NBA ready but he has to compete PT with Monta Ellis, Speedy Claxton, Corey Maggette, Stephen Jackson, CJ Watson, Acie Law, Azubuike, Belinelli and Anthony Morrow. Did I miss anyone?

UPDATE: ESPN reports that the Suns and the Warriors are discussing a possible trade of Amare Stoudemire for Andris Biedrins, Brandan Wright and Curry. If that is the case, Curry would be a good protege to Steve Nash.

8. New York – Jordan Hill, 6'10”, PF, Arizona

So the Knicks failed to get the coveted Curry. Jordan Hill is actually quite a decent consolation prize. An atheltic forward who is good at rebounding, Jordan Hill would be a safe fall back plan should David Lee walk.

9. Toronto – DeMar DeRozan, 6'6”, SG, USC

Quick and athletic, people says he excels in transitional games. Good if the Raptors really decide to push the ball. A bit raw but has huge upside. GM Brian Colangelo has liked him for long. BTW, I really hate the trend of getting all the DeXXXX as first name. This is worse, “De” went in both first name and surname. Sick. I mean, you ain't no French, are you?

10. Milwaukee – Brandon Jennings, 6'2”, PG, Italy

Background info: Brandon Jennings skipped college and went to play for Roma in Italy last year. It is rumored that he cannot pass SAT. Anyway, he was hailed as one of the best PGs in the country before he left for Europe, however his stint with Roma did not impress people. His injury concern also scares some GMs away. Ultra quick and a big time scorer. But I just don't like kids dodging or failing SAT and skipped college. He needs to compete PT with Ramon Sessions and Luke Ridnour.

11. New Jersey – Terrence Williams, 6'6”, SG, Louisville

The Nets traded away Vince Carter and need replacement. One of the best athletes in the draft. But the problem is, he's a senior. This means he's either a late boomer or that he's really not that talented as nobody wanted him in the past 3 years. I'm more leaning on the latter. I'm not saying that I'm against “Stay In School”, but I seldom see a senior ended up becoming a bona fide star. The only exception may be Shane Battier, who is a real special and terrific player probably will never be voted as an all-star.

12. Charlotte – Gerald Henderson, 6'5”, SG, Duke

Here's the scout report: athletic shooting guard with versatile all-round game, smart and unselfish. He's from Duke. A guy who plays the right way. Yes, a perfect Larry Brown's guy, makes me remember of Raja Bell and Igoudala. He should fit in well in Larry Brown's system. His name already looks boring to me.

13. Indiana – Tyler Hansbrough, 6'10”, PF, UNC

The first Tar Heel picked in this draft. Again, he's a senior, which raises the red flag. He's tough, physical, but let's face it, he's not that talented. Doesn't look like a star to me, but should be able to contribute right away. Talking about the Pacers, I found that Larry Bird is conservative in draft picks, always opts for college stars and proven players. He likes to go with the consensus and seldom takes risks. Not sure it's good or not for a GM.

14. Phoenix – Earl Clark, 6'10”, SF, Louisville

Like I said, given the Amre-Biedrins trade is pending, it's a huge unknown for the Suns. Clark is a superb athlete, have potential. But a 6'10” SF? A bit too tall for me. Anyway, Grant Hill is old and the Suns need someone to spell him at SF.

15. Detroit – Austin Daye, 6'11”, SF, Gonzaga

Daye was projected to be a second rounder but Joe Dumars surprised everyone and pick him at #15. Again, 6'11” playing at SF doesn't sound right to me. Just checked his weight, 192 lb. Wow, 6'11” but 192 lb? Does he have any mustle at all?

16. Chicago – James Johnson, 6'8”, PF, Wake Forest

It is said that the Bulls had wanted James Johnson for a while. He's athletic, but his game is raw, and he's a tweener between SF/PF. We will see.

17. Philadelphia – Jrue Holiday, 6'4”, PG, UCLA

He is ultra talented, but also very raw. People said he would be a top-5 if he goes to the draft next year. Too bad he chose to enter this year's draft. Probably the top 3 PG in the pick in terms of talent (along with Rubio and Jennings), it's a big steal (or gamble) for the Sixers. He's definitely a work-in-progress though.

18. Minnesota (from Miami, traded to Denver) – Ty Lawson, 6'1”, PG, UNC

Another Tar Heel picked in the first round. Great leadership and good fundamentals. He helped the Tar Heel to win the Tourney. The only short fall is that he's a bit undersized (some reports say he's just 5'11”). A good backup for Billups, who currently has none.

19. Atlanta – Jeff Teague, 6'2”, PG, Wake Forest

No, he ain't no his alumni Chris Paul. He's a scoring PG, some said he's more an undersized SG rather than a pure PG. Not an ideal replacement for Bibby. If the Hawks fail to re-sign Bibby, once again they will have no pure PG, just like what they were before they got Bibby.

20. Utah – Eric Maynor, 6'3”, PG, VA Commonwealth

Another PG. Another senior. Well, a backup for Deron Williams.

21. New Orleans – Darren Collison, 6'2”, PG, UCLA

Another PG. Another senior. 6'2”, 166 lb. Another small guard for the Hornets? Well, Westbrook played off the bench last year and yet was drafted before Collison one year ago. Collison is steady, but upside is really limited. A career backup guy.

22. Portland (from Dallas) – Victor Claver, 6'11”, SF, Spain

The Blazers are packed with young players, so they go the Spurs way: picking a European player who has potential, let him play in Europe for a couple of years first. A good tactic.

23. Sacramento (from Houston) – Omri Casspi, 6'9”, SF Israel

Will be the first Israeli player in NBA history. People compare him with Nocioni, and he will back up Nocioni. Good.

24. Dallas (from Portand, traded to OKC) – B.J. Mullens, 7'1”, C, Ohio State

Finally another center picked in the draft. They said OKC's GM Presti has liked Mullens for long, but he remains a huge unknown and is a risky pick for them.

25. Oklahoma City (from San Antonio, traded to DAL) – Rodrigue Beaubois, 6'2”, PG, France

Bonjour! A PG from French? But he ain't no Tony Parker. He's quite undeveloped and likely will stay in France for a while.

26. Chicago (from Denver via OKC) – Tai Gibson, 6'10”, PF, USC

OK, I know nothing about him. But 6'10 and 214 lb, hmm another skinny PF for the Bulls?

27. Memphis (from Orlando) – DeMarre Carroll, 6'8”, PF, Missouri

Another DeXXX. Sick. Tough and energetic, a role player material.

28. Minnesota (from Boston) – Wayne Ellington, 6'5”, SG, UNC

OK, the third and final Tar Heel in the first round. He hit quite some clutch shots in the Tourney. An established shooter who can do not much else. People fear that he might be another JJ Redick.

29. LA Lakers (traded to NYK) – Toney Douglas, 6'2”, SG, Florida State

No idea. The Lakers doesn't want no rookie, probably to save money to re-sign Odom and/or Ariza.

30. Cleveland – Christian Eyenga, 6'6”, SF, Congo

He's from Congo but plays in Spain. A teammate of Rubio. Words are, the Cavs will go Spurs way by letting Eyenga play in Spain for a few years before bringing him to the US.

That is it for the first round. Overall not much surprise, not much drama, and not many trades too. The only highlight is that two supposedly lottery bound kids, Sam Young (SF) and DeJuan Blair (PF), both from Pittsburgh, failed to make it to the first round. Young went to Memphis at #36 and Blair went to San Antonio at #37. It's a steal for the Spurs, once again.

Yawn.

FInal Words on the Finals 2009

First, the Lakers deserved to win. Hate to say that, but the Lakers were simply a better team than the Magic. Better talent, better depth, better offense, better defense, better coaching. You name it.

Secondly, Kobe was the MVP by default. I don't think he played extremely well, and the championship was not won by him, but just because he's the best player in the winning team, he's the MVP. 32.4 PPG didn't pop any eyes, nor the 43% FG. Yes, 7.4 APG is certainly surprising, but let's get to that later. I mean, he didn't hit that much clutch shots. Alas, maybe except the blowout game 1, I can say that Kobe didn't won one game in the Finals. I agree with Bill Simmons, Kobe did NOT elevate his game to another level, nor has he changed a lot from last year.

Thirdly, the Lakers' supporting cast won the Finals. Pau Gasol, the so-called second banana, played it all out. He didn't have much touch (thanks to Kobe), but he hit a staggering 60% FG. Moreover, he played it tough to play good defense (which is underrated) against D-Howard. Derek Fisher simply saved the Lakers in Game 4 by staying clutch. Yes, he's slow and helpless in defense, but he just did what he does the best: shooting Js and initiating offense. Lamar Odom, against all odds, did not choke and played a pivotal role in helping the Lakers to win. His versatility, especially his defense, caused much trouble for the Magic, on both offense and defense. Andrew Bynum was still not the dominant big man people had expected him to be (at least not yet), but he did play with heart and his sheer presence in the paint at least partially slowed DH12.

But the huge factor is Trevor Ariza. IMHO, Kobe, Gasol, Fisher and Odom were basically doing whta everyone had expected them to do, and they were no better than what they were one year ago. But Ariza, he really transcended his game in the postseason. Reputed by his athleticism and defense, he had developed into a reliable 3-pt shooter (a la Rick Fox, Robert Horry mode) with a whopping 41.7% from the arc. Needless to say about his terrific defense (remember the clutch steals against the Nuggets?), but it's his ability to play inside-out that really rendered the Magic helpless. Ariza is a perfect player under the Lakers' system. It would be a grave mistake if the Lakers do not re-sign him (he can opt out of his contract this summer).

As for the Magic, well, they should have not regret. Look, they should have come to here in the first place. Imagine a heatlhy KG, or the Cavs with a long defender which could have got by trading away the expiring contract of Wally Szczerbiak. D-Howard was pathetically neutralized by the Lakers. Part of the reason is that he really has no low post move. Once again, it proves that a shooting team, even with a dominant big man like D12, could not win championship. The length, and to an extent their better defense, caused much trouble for the Magic's outside threats, namely Rashard Lewis, Hedo Turkoglu, Courtney Lee or Mickael Pietrus. The Cavs lost to the Magic because they did not have a second perimeter defender other than LBJ, but the Lakers got Kobe, Ariza and Odom to throw on Lewis and Turkoglu. Rookie Lee was simply overwhelmed, while Pietrus did play his best, only his best was not good enough to lead the Magic to a win. As I had said before, Rafer Alston shot the Magic out of the championship. Skip To My Lou simply is not a starting PG to win the championship.

Talking about PG, I must blame Stan Van Gundy. I think he simply played too much Jameer Nelson. Not that Alston is way better than Nelson, but from what I saw, Nelson was simply not ready. He's rusty, he looked tentative, and he's just out of sync. He's obviously still bothered by his shoulder injry, as his handle was extremely shaky. Maybe he did hit a few Js from outside, but as the PG, he failed to create open looks for teammates, and he was not able to break down the defense of the Lakers. But frankly, even for a 100% Nelson, which could burn Fisher with ease, the Magic would not be able to beat the Lakers.

Last but not least, I think the Lakers was lucky. First and foremost, thanks to the Grizzlies for the godsend Gasol. Secondly, thanks to the Magic for Ariza. Furthermore, they managed to stay healthy, while everybody else was having some not-so-minor injuries - Spurs' Ginobili, Celtics' KG, to name a few. Also, they were lucky to see the Magic, which had serious problem defending its paint. I wouldn't say the same about the Cavs, or the Celtics. They looked tentative during the season, only they were able to peak at the right time. Yes, that's because they have Phil Jackson. But strangely enough, though I said it before, I didn't see much triangle during the Finals, or the entire Playoffs. I think they really miss Tex Winter.

Looking ahead, the Lakers will be the team to beat. They still have Kobe, who is just 30, and they have the deepest roster in the League. That is, assuming that they keep Odom and Ariza. Yes, they need to address the aging issue of Fisher, but I see some potential in Shannon Brown. As always, it would be a challenge for the Lakers to repeat, and I would love to see what the Cavs would do this summer, knowing how desperate they are to convince LBJ to stay in Cleveland this year.

Yes, I'm still a Kobe-hater, and a Lakers-hater, and I much admit that I was just half-hearted when watching this Finals. I wish other teams, Magic, Cavs, Celtics, Spurs et al to come up with a better team next year and beat the Lakers.

BEAT L.A.!

NBA FInals Preview

Finals preview, let's break it down:

Guards: Fisher + Kobe + Shannon Brown + Farmar vs. Alston + Courtney Lee + Pietrus + Anthony Johnson

Adv: Lakers

Fisher is Lakers' weakest link, but arguably PG is also the weakest link in the Magic. Alston likely will have just 1 hot shooting night for every 3 poor shooting night. He will shoot the Magic to losses. Fisher is ultra slow but he's a much better shooter and facilitator than Alston. Brown will burn Anthony Johnson with his quickness.

Needless to say anything about Kobe. BTW, I never understand why people say Pietrus did a good job guarding LBJ. For goodness' sake LBJ averaged 38.5 PPG on 48.7% FG against the Magic. Yes he is LBJ, but the stats were still way higher than that against the Pistons and the Hawks. I don't see how Pietrus could stop Kobe.


Forwards: Ariza + Gasol + Odom + Luke Walton vs. Turkoglu + Rashard Lewis

Adv: Lakers

One of the Magic's main weapons is outside shooting ofTurkoglu and Lewis. While they took full advantage of the undersized Cavs to score, expect them to have more difficulty to score against Ariza and Odom. Kobe might spend some time guarding either of them too.

Another problem of the Magic is that they have basically ZERO depth at the forward position, whereas depth is exactly the forte of the Lakers. Ariza is young and athletic, Gasol will start at PF but finish at C, and Odom can play either SF or PF, and can play inside-outside. The Magic will get their hands full on such a 3-man rotation, not to mention the occasional contribution from Luke Walton.


C: Andrew Bynum + Gasol vs. Dwight Howard + Gotat

Adv: Magic x 2

I don't think I emphasize it enough, the advantage of Magic is HUGE. The red hot D12 is totally unstoppable right now. The worst nightmare for the Lakers? D12 is hitting his FTs lately. So the Lakers cannot throw out Josh Powell (and his 6 fouls-to-give) to do the "hack-the-superman" tactics.

On the other side, we have the "promising" Andrew Bynum, who is just a part-time here, averaging only 17 MPG this post season. He's so poor in defense that he was either in foul trouble or the coach simply benched him all the way. Against D12, Bynum will easily get fouled-out and/or DNP-CD. As for Gasol, well, we know he's soft and can't imagine how he could guard D12. Alas, how on earth could the Lakers slow down Dwight Howard if they couldn't even slow down Nene and K-Mart? But Gasol will score some in the mid-range against D12.

Coach: Phil Jackson vs. Stan Van Gundy

Adv: Even

OK, my personal preference aside, to be fair, SVG is a good coach who maximizes his team's performance. He's flexible and makes changes when necessary. I think he's a better coach than his bro, Jeff. He only talks too much. Yikes.

As for the Zen Master, well, frankly, I have serious reservation. It seems like since the retirement of assistant coach Tex Winter (the architect of the Triangle Offense), Phil is no longer the same. Many a time, he made questionable moves and he simply didn't have the midas touch on some key moments that he used to have. Worse, his team is super inconsistent and doesn't play first-class defense. So, maybe we should credit at least part of his past success to Tex Winter then?


Gameplays:

The greatest strengths of the Lakers are their versatility and depth. If the Lakers could share the ball like they did in Game 6 of the Conf. Finals, the Magic will have serious trouble guarding them. The Lakers can score in the paint, mid-range and even the 3s. Kobe, Odom and Gasol, all of them can score or pass, which makes them ultra difficult to guard. In addition, if the Lakers run fastbreaks, they can use their depth and athleticism to wear down the Magic. Last but not least, they have Kobe to bail them out in close games.

On the other hand, the Magic will continue their inside-out game play. They have huge advantage by posting up Howard against the soft frontcourt of the Lakers. If the Lakers decide to double-team him, this will generate tons of open looks for the Magic's shooting stars like Turk, Lewis, Lee and Pietrus. However, for one-on-one, the Magic's perimeter players are not that easy to score against Kobe, Ariza and Odom.

The wildcard? Lakers' defense.

Although people are saying that Nelson might return, but given his shoulder problem, his contribution will be limited, more a mental boost than anything. So he's not a wildcard. The wildcard is whether the Lakers can stay focused and stop the Magic. We have seen them played terrific defense before, when they were concentrated enough. If they can somehow control the damage of D12 (c'mon, you can't STOP him) and avoid open looks on the perimeter, the Lakers will beat the Magic with its versatility and depth. On the other hand, if they become lethargic in defense and try to out-score opponents, the Magic will prevail.

Prediction: Lakers in 6.